CRYPTO CASINORAKEBACKRun the numbersGame contribution: three percentages to keep separate
Updated
Reward contribution, bonus-wagering contribution and loyalty-point weighting can be different even inside one casino. Use the percentage for the calculation you are performing.
Luckiest publishes a 100% slots cashback weight and a 25% weight for other casino games.
Read the Luckiest reward review →
The same $1,000 play can feed three different meters
| Meter | Illustrative rule | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Reward earning | 4% edge × 5% rebate × 100% eligible | $2 reward |
| Bonus playthrough | 20% contribution | $200 toward the wagering target |
| Loyalty progress | 5 points per dollar | 5,000 points, not $5,000 |
These are independent examples. They must not be combined into one formula merely because all three percentages or factors appear on a casino help page. This is especially important where a points table is detailed but the cash reward is personalised.
For a concrete game, record its provider, product category and balance type. A named exclusion overrides a broad statement that slots count. A reduced bonus contribution should not automatically be applied a second time to an already edge-adjusted rakeback formula.
Short answer: apply the game factor before the reward rate.
Never assume 100% contribution. Slots often receive the highest factor, while live games, baccarat, low-edge table games and sports may earn less or nothing. Apply the operator’s game factor before the reward percentage—not after it.
Load the operator and game family before estimating a reward.
Open the operator databaseSlots, tables, live games and sports do not share one contribution.
The matrix separates published eligibility from exclusions and fields that still require a live-account check.
| Operator | Slots | Tables | Live | Sports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stake | Published formula | Edge-based | Check title | Separate formula |
| BetFury | Eligible | Check provider | Check provider | Odds ≥ 1.1 |
| FortuneJack | Coefficient varies | Coefficient varies | Coefficient varies | Separate product |
“Check” is a deliberate unknown. Provider- and title-level rules can override a family label.
Captures selected for eligibility—not headline percentages.
These records support game-family rules. Unknown provider-level factors remain visibly unresolved.
What this supports: game contribution. The visible rewards page establishing the level-based program.
Open full evidence file
What this supports: game contribution. Rate, standard/VIP access and claim frequency.
Open full evidence file
What this supports: game contribution. Current operator context for the combined reward claim.
Open full evidence fileCheck eligibility before multiplying the percentage.
A zero or partial game factor can erase most of the advertised return even when the headline rate is accurate.
Can a game count for VIP points but not a bonus?
Yes. The point system and a promotion’s wagering rules can have different eligibility lists. Check the specific meter.
Rules behind this comparison
These links support the operator conditions. Worked amounts are our calculations using the assumptions shown in the table.